“This Town” – Where the Money Is

July 5, 2013


Review of Mark Leibovich’s ‘This Town’

.By , Published: July 3 E-mail the writers

Carlos Lozada is Outlook editor of The Washington Post. Follow him on Twitter:@carloslozadaWP

Mark Leibovich toyed with several titles for his new book on self-interest, self-importance and self-perpetuation in the nation’s capital. “Suck-Up City” was one. “The Club” was another. Finally, he settled on “This Town,” a nod, he explains, to the “faux disgust” with which people here refer to their natural habitat.

It’s not bad, but the longer I roamed around “This Town,” the more I thought Leibovich should have borrowed Newsweek’s memorable post-Sept. 11, 2001, cover line: “Why They Hate Us.” His tour through Washington only feeds the worst suspicions anyone can have about the place — a land driven by insecurity, hypocrisy and cable hits, where friendships are transactional, blind-copying is rampant and acts of public service appear largely accidental.

Only two things keep you turning pages between gulps of Pepto: First, in Leibovich’s hands, this state of affairs is not just depressing, it’s also kind of funny. Second, you want to know whether the author thinks anyone in Washington — anyone at all? — is worthy of redemption.

(Are you in This Town? Read the unauthorized index here.)

Leibovich, chief national correspondent for the New York Times Magazine and a former reporter at The Washington Post (where we overlapped briefly but never met), is a master of the political profile, with his subjects revealing themselves in the most unflattering light. That talent becomes something of a crutch in “This Town,” which offers more a collection of profiles and scenes than a rich narrative. Still, his characters reveal essential archetypes of Washington power.

First, there is longtime NBC news reporter Andrea Mitchell — a conflict of interest in human form. Married to former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, Mitchell has specialized in covering administrations and campaigns that “overlapped considerably with her social and personal habitat,” as Leibovich puts it.

There are those weekend getaways at George Shultz’s home. And dinner with Tipper and Al. And that surprise 50th-birthday party for Condi. And what do you do when you’re reporting on the 2008 financial crisis and many people are pointing at your husband as a chief culprit? NBC tossed up a fig leaf: allowing Mitchell to cover the politics of dealing with the financial crisis, but not the conditions that gave rise to it. Such hair-splitting becomes inevitable, Leibovich writes, because Mitchell trying to avoid conflicts of interest is “like an owl trying to avoid trees.”

Next up is superlawyer Bob Barnett — if he doesn’t represent you, you must not be worth representing. He negotiated Hillary Clinton’s $8 million book advance (not to mention the $10 million he reeled in for Bill), plus eight-figure deals for Sarah Palin in book, speaking and television gigs. “The degree to which so many elite D.C. players stream to a single superlawyer cash redemption center is striking,” Leibovich notes, “even by the parochial standards of the ant colony.”

Yet, for all his antique cuff links, Barnett longs for the very thing he delivers for his clients: a reputation upgrade. “He hates being called an ‘agent,’ ” Leibovich explains, “with its hired-gun connotations.” Barnett’s desire to be considered a Washington wise man is evident in his desperate quest to join President Obama’s presidential debate prep team. When he finally broke in, before Obama’s last debate with Mitt Romney, he prefaced one of his suggestions to the president by explaining the “conventional wisdom” on an issue. Obama cracked, “Bob, you ARE the conventional wisdom.”

7/3/2013 9:36 PM EDT
You know what is amazing? The fact that people are going to buy/read this book, and the Post is reporting on/reviewing it, when there are thousands of honest, hardworking Federal employees in DC who do their best to work for the American people to make a difference, and toil in complete obscurity – and are happy doing so – and all they get is a bunch of commenters in every online forum in DC and elsewhere calling them lazy, good-for-nothing turds. Are there some who are lazy? Are there some who don’t pull their weight? Are there some who are incompetent? Of course, just like in the private sector. But the scientists at NIH, the people who work for the FEMA director in the middle of Hurricane Sandy, the back-office people at Social Security working to reduce the backlog of applicants under changing demographics, the wonky budget analysts at agencies and OMB who are trying to work magic under sequester, all get the shaft. That’s the real story of DC, my friends.
7/3/2013 9:45 PM EDT
He’s not writing about all federal employees. He’s making the point that some of the biggest players in the media are literally in bed with the people they’re covering, reporting on, people who have in some cases made disastrous decisions that have affected us deeply.
7/3/2013 10:20 PM EDT
I understand. But my point is that this is another vapid, gossipy book (Andrea Mitchell reports on finance! And she’s married to Alan Greenspan! Gasp!) about the revolving door, massive conflicts of interest, and name dropping, but no one writes about the people who quietly toil to do things the right way and constantly get dumped on. Maybe if someone did, it would actually attract some of the right kind of people to public service, instead of constantly turning them off of it.

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: